By now you have probably read the TechCrunch post looking at the latest US Venture Capital numbers from both both PricewaterhouseCoopers/NVCA based on data from Thomson Financial. There is nothing overly surprising about the slowdown in funding, but nobody seems to explain why it happened – I will take a shot at offering an explanation. I will run through the numbers again for those who have not seen the reports. Whilst the numbers do not paint a pretty picture, Adeo Ressi of thefunded.com makes a good argument in his latest note, suggesting that the numbers are not as dire as they look and he offers some good analysis going forward – I will take a look at this too.
The Numbers…..
The two, quarterly reports both found that venture volume dropped in the first quarter, with PwC/NVCA reporting $3.0 billion in 549 deals nationally, and Dow Jones VentureSource reported $3.90 billion across 477 deals. The results were the lowest venture level since 1997, according to Pwc/NVCA numbers, and the lowest since 1996, according to Dow Jones VentureSource. Information technology investments fell 53% year-over-year to $1.7 billion—the lowest since 1997, and the lowest volume of deals since 1995. Clean tech fell by 74% to $117m.
Why have the numbers deteriorated so much?
1. Portfolio companies needed cash: As a result of the downturn some cash strapped portfolio companies needed immediate support. As a result venture capitalists did a large number of internal funding rounds. This often results in complex penalty terms, lower valuations, and smaller investment amounts – putting downward pressure on the average deal size.
2.Nothing can go public (due to market volatility) and mergers and acquisitions are few and far between – where is the exit going to come from? There is no obvious high growth sector to invest in and their investors have been hit in nearly every nook and cranny of their portfolios. As a result VC’s have held back their investments or have driven extremely hard bargains.
3.Limited partners have pulled from VC as an asset class: The number of new venture capital funds that were backed by limited partners fell by 81% between 2008 – 2009 . Venture Capitalists have been complaining that traditional sources for venture financing have stopped supporting the asset class.
4.New compliance rules for venture capitalists: A large number of LPs asked their Venture Capital partners to comply with a mark-to-market accounting rule, FAS 157, which is better at valuing mature private companies with public market comparables than six-month-old startups. VC’s were forced to go through a time consuming process to figure out the reporting standards which one could argue distracted them from making investments.
5.Limited partners asked VC’s to stop investing: Various limited partners had engaged in a popular strategy of accumulating debt, and they did not have the cash on hand to honor every investment commitment after both the equity and debt markets collapsed.
Looking forward…
Adeo Ressi’s highlights that three major causes of the slowdown have passed. Limited Partners will have more liquidity with the rising value of public market equities (if the recent recovery was not a dead cat bounce). Most venture funds have addressed FAS 157 reporting processes and determined which portfolio companies to save
Venture investments will start to surface as venture capitalists take a step back and evaluate what investments to make given the new shape of the economy. New investments will start to surface towards the end of Q2 and in Q3 2009. Since new investments are smaller than later-stage support, the amount invested in 2009 will be significantly smaller than any amount in the last 10 years, but the volume of deals will start to normalise by the end of the year.